 |
|
Comparison of chemical pregnancy rates according to the anesthetic method during ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization: a retrospective study
Hyun Joo Heo, Yu Yil Kim, Ji Hye Lee, Han Gyeol Lee, Seung Min Baek, Ki Man Kim
Anesth Pain Med. 2020;15(1):49-52. Published online 2020 Jan 31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.2020.15.1.49
|
|
Citations to this article as recorded by
 Pain Management during Ultrasound Guided Transvaginal Oocyte Retrieval – A Narrative Review
Puvithra Thanikachalam, DilipKumar Govindan
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences.2023; 16(1): 2. CrossRef Comparison of different anesthetic methods for oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive technologies
I.L. Ushakov, V.I. Potievskaya
Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya.2022; (1): 88. CrossRef Anaesthesia for assisted reproductive technology (ART): A narrative review
Ranjana Khetarpal, Veena Chatrath, Puneetpal Kaur, Anjan Trikha
Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care.2022; 12(1): 5. CrossRef Similar reproductive outcomes between lesbian-shared IVF (ROPA) and IVF with autologous oocytes
Pedro Brandão, Nathan Ceschin, Fábio Cruz, Ricardo Sousa-Santos, Sérgio Reis-Soares, José Bellver
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.2022; 39(9): 2061. CrossRef Optimizing embryological aspects of oocyte retrieval, oocyte denudation, and embryo loading for transfer
Israel MALDONADO ROSAS, Christina ANAGNOSTOPOULOU, Neha SINGH, Nivita GUGNANI, Keerti SINGH, Dimple DESAI, Mahsa DARBANDI, Madhumita MANOHARAN, Sara DARBANDI, Annapoorani CHOCKALINGAM, Sofia I. LEONARDI DIAZ, Sajal GUPTA, Shinnosuke KURODA, Renata FINELLI
Panminerva Medica.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
|