Anesth Pain Med Search


Anesth Pain Med > Volume 16(1); 2021 > Article
Yang, Park, and Jeong: Change of inspired oxygen concentration and temperature in low flow anesthesia
TO THE EDITOR: For low-flow anesthesia, the anesthesia workstation, monitoring technology and desflurane, sevoflurane, which were a low blood-gas partition coefficient, have gradually been adopted. Low-flow anesthesia is considered effective in maintaining the heat and the moisture of the breathing circuit and preserving the mucociliary function of the respiratory tract. In addition, it is safer and more effective at lowering the economic burden and global warming potential [1,2]. We read, with interest, your paper on “Change of inspired oxygen concentration in low flow anesthesia” (Anesth Pain Med 2020; 15: 434-40). We appreciate your results and have some questions to discuss.
We have a few questions about the monitoring and the maintenance of body temperature. How did you maintain and monitor the temperature of the operating room? Was the patient's temperature measured only in the esophagus? What was the depth of the esophageal temperature probe? Depending on the room temperature and the depth of insertion, the body temperature can change with ambient influences, such as blood flow of venous return and inhaled gas temperature [3]. Therefore, the authors used a heated breathing system and a heat moisture exchanger (HME) to heat the breathing circuit. During anesthetic care, the patient’s temperature did not show a statistically significant change after 60-75 min of low flow. However, it started increasing significantly after 120 min of low flow.
In this study, soda lime (CO2 absorber) and a standard circular rebreathing circuit with a heated breathing circuit were used. Did you use the HME in the heated breathing circuit? One CO2 molecule, exhaled by the patient, produces two water (H2O) molecules and generates approximately 40°C of heat during its reaction with soda lime. The moisture and heat generated by the reaction are sufficient for the patient's humidification and warmth during anesthesia 30 min after induction [1,4]. Therefore, if a low-flow system is used, there is no reason to use a heated breathing circuit and HME, sufficient heat and moisture can be maintained without a heated breathing circuit and HME [1-5]. We think that the increased temperature within the circuit is not an advantage but a problem caused by adding the heated breathing circuit and HME during low flow rather than high flow. What do you expect to get if you do not attach either of or both the heating breathing circuit and HME?



No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.


Methodology: Hong Seuk Yang. Writing - review & editing: Dong Ho Park. Supervision: Chang Young Jeong.


1. Baxter AD. Low and minimal flow inhalational anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 1997; 44: 643-52; quiz 652-3.
crossref pmid
2. Baum JA, Aitkenhead AR. Low-flow anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1995; 50 Suppl: 37-44.
crossref pmid
3. Lenhardt R. Monitoring and thermal management. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2003; 17: 569-81.
crossref pmid
4. Parthasarathy S. The closed circuit and the low flow systems. Indian J Anaesth 2013; 57: 516-24.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Braz JRC, Braz MG, Hayashi Y, Martins RHG, Betini M, Braz LG, et al. Effects of different fresh gas flows with or without a heat and moisture exchanger on inhaled gas humidity in adults undergoing general anaesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017; 34: 515-25.
crossref pmid

Article category

Browse all articles >


Browse all articles >

Editorial Office
101-3503, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
Tel: +82-2-792-5128    Fax: +82-2-792-4089    E-mail:                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Society of Anesthesiologists.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next