INTRODUCTION
With increasing average life expectancy and the physical activeness of the population aged 60 and older, major orthopedic arthroplasty is becoming more common. In particular, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become a major orthopedic procedure in the aging population in Korea; additionally, venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the major complications associated with TKA [
1]. Substantial variation exists in the reported rates of postoperative VTE following TKA in the Asian population, with the general consensus being that the rates are lower in the Asian population than the Western population [
1-
4]. Over time, various studies have been published regarding the incidence of VTE following TKA, in the Korean population [
3,
5].
Major lower extremity orthopedic surgeries can be performed with either regional or general anesthesia. Previous studies have shown that regional anesthesia may decrease the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) during major lower extremity orthopedic surgery [
6,
7]. Conversely, several previous studies also suggest a comparable incidence of VTE between regional and general anesthesia for total joint arthroplasty [
8,
9]. However, in case of general anesthesia, the predisposition to VTE could be offset with extensively applied postoperative pain control modalities and/or the newest technology. These could be used in conjugation with recently developed anesthetics for general anesthesia. Despite such varied results, until now, no study has compared the incidence of VTE due to regional versus general anesthesia.
The present study aims to compare the incidence of early postoperative VTE due to epidural versus general anesthesia for TKA. We hypothesize whether significant differences would exist between the two anesthetic methods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of our hospital. Operative records from our hospital dated between January 2011 and June 2014 were reviewed. To determine the incidence of VTE according to anesthetic methods (epidural versus general), the criteria for exclusion was set as follows: previous VTE or venous disease, steroid or hormone replacement or oral contraceptive therapy, continuation of the anticoagulation or antiplatelet agent, congestive heart failure, respiratory failure, hematologic disease, malignancy, hip fracture, preoperative immobility, and a history of vascular surgery. These factors have been previously reported in the literature to be risk factors for VTE [
2,
10,
11]. There were 589 cases of patients with primary TKA that met the inclusion criteria; patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I, or II comprised the study. A total of 208 patients had undergone total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), whilst 381 patients had undergone continuous epidural anesthesia. The preoperative diagnosis of all patients in this study was limited to primary osteoarthritis. Prophylactic chemical anticoagulation for VTE was not used in case of both the groups. All operations included the use of a pneumatic tourniquet compression (Tourniquet 2500 ELC, VBM Medizintechnik GmbH, Germany), which was released before surgical skin closure. All patients wore calf-high intermittent pneumatic compression stockings on the contralateral leg, preoperatively, and a Jones compression dressing on the operated limb promptly after surgery. All patients were educated about post-operative exercises before the operation. Approximately 2 hours post-operatively, as soon as the patients recovered from anesthesia, active quadriceps and ankle motion exercises were initiated carefully while the patients were in bed. Two days after surgery, the drainage from the surgical site on the affected limb was removed, and the dressing was changed using a compression stocking. Active ambulation and continuous passive motion exercises were initiated if the patient’s status of vital signs and wounds appeared to be normal. All drugs with antiplatelet activity were discontinued from 7 days before to 11 days after the operation until the international normalized ratio values returned to normal preoperative ranges. No other prophylactic antithrombotic drug was used during or after surgery. Our records showed that, epidural anesthesia was the main anesthetic choice, although, general anesthesia was performed according to the doctor’s/patients’ preferences, or in instances of expected procedural difficulties for epidural anesthesia, such as anatomical difficulties or previous history of spine surgery. Patients who had switched from epidural anesthesia to general anesthesia were not included in this study. Operation time was recorded from the first skin incision to the end of the last stitch of the wound. All patients were administered patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) to control postoperative pain and rehabilitate.
In the epidural anesthesia group (epidural group), ropivacaine (18-26 ml, 0.75%) was administered through a lumbar epidural catheter. All patients received midline approach epidural anesthesia in the lateral decubitus position. The insertion area was L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspaces using the loss of resistance technique; the catheter was introduced 4-5 cm further above the insertion site. The upper level of analgesia (cold temperature test) extended, on average, to the fourth thoracic segment. We sedated the patients with 2% propofol, at 3-4 mg/kg/h, which was administered intravenously during surgery. The patients breathed 100% oxygen through a face-mask during the operation. After surgery, the patients were provided a mixture of 450 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine and 50 μg of fentanyl at a 2 ml/h flow rate, administered through the catheter for 2 days using epidural PCA (bolus dose 1 ml, lockout time 15 minutes).
In the general anesthesia group (general group), propofol was administered to the patients via a target-controlled infusion (TCI) device (Orchestra, Fresenius Vial, France). The effect-site concentration of propofol was titrated during the operation on the basis of the bispectral index within the range of 40-60. Remifentanil was simultaneously administered via TCI. The effect-site concentration of remifentanil was usually titrated within 20% variation, compared to pre-anesthetic vital signs that depended on the autonomic response, deduced through arterial pressure or heart rate during the operation. Rocuronium was used for tracheal intubation as well as intraoperative neuromuscular blockade. Intermittent positive pressure ventilation with an oxygen/air mixture was provided. After surgery, the patients were extubated and intravenous PCA with the mixture of fentanyl (0.25 μg/kg/h) and ketorolac (0.03 μg/kg/h) was used for 2 days (total volume including saline, 60 ml; basal rate, 0.5 ml/h; bolus dose, 0.5 ml; lockout time, 15 minutes).
All the patients underwent routine DVT computed tomography (CT) with contrast medium, which was conducted for the lower extremity, the abdomen, and chest angiography on postoperative day 7. The interpretation of the DVT CT angiography was conducted by the same experienced radiologist that conducted the procedure. Each lower extremity was scanned from the inguinal ligament to the level of the ankle, which included the trifurcation of the popliteal vein. The criteria for a proximal DVT was defined as a thrombus in the abdomen, femoral, or superficial femoral vein, whereas distal DVT was defined as a thrombus in the veins below the popliteal. PTE was diagnosed if a thrombus was seen in the segmental or lobar pulmonary artery.
In case a patient was diagnosed with proximal DVT or PTE, warfarin was immediately administered for VTE treatment based on the pulmonologist’s consultation. An anticoagulant was administered until a follow-up DVT CT angiography was performed 3 months later.
During the postoperative period, we also reviewed for the occurrence of cardiopulmonary morbidity (hypotension, myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema), postoperative bleeding, opioid related adverse effect (nausea, vomiting, pruritus, sedation, urinary retention), cognitive defect, epidural anesthesia related neurologic complication, delayed motor blockade, or prolonged hospital stay, in addition to VTE.
Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., USA). Descriptive statistics were expressed as mean ± standard deviation for quantitative variables (age, height, weight, body mass index, and operation time) or frequency and proportion for categorical variables (gender, physical status, preoperative smoking, and VTE). The statistical significance of differences in mean values between two groups was assessed with a
t-test or Mann-Whitney
U test as appropriate, and the associations between the developments of DVT and PTE were evaluated by χ
2 test and Fisher’s exact test (both DVT and PTE). Generalized estimating equations were used to discern correlations between differences (anesthetic group, age, and gender) and the binary responses (the incidence of VTE). The parameters were analyzed according to the anesthetic method (general vs. epidural), age (per year), and gender. These equations also generate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05 in all tests.
DISCUSSION
In studies investigating the western population, DVT after a major orthopedic surgery is known to occur in 40%-84% of patients without prophylaxis [
12,
13]. In Korea, the risks of developing of DVT and PTE following TKA are reported to be very low compared to those of patients from western countries [
1,
3,
5,
14]. The low incidence of VTE in Asians is thought to be due to differences in basic genetic factors, in addition to other risk factors such as low incidence of venous disease, obesity, and hyperlipidemia [
15]. Although many studies have investigated the risk factors for VTE following TKA, most of them have used orthopedic approaches. In addition, no observation study in Korea has investigated VTE incidence depending on the type of anesthesia. If the influence of anesthesia on VTE incidence following TKA is identified, and early detection of VTE by a safe, reliable, and time-saving method is achievable, it may be helpful to prevent fatal PTE without the use of prophylactic anticoagulants.
Epidural anesthesia is the preferred anesthetic management for TKA [
6,
16]. It is considered to be superior in reducing blood loss, tourniquet pain, and analgesia, and the decreased incidence of VTE as a result of using epidural anesthesia is considered to be one of the reasons why epidural anesthesia is chosen over general anesthesia for TKA. Recent systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies have shown that although patient outcomes support regional anesthesia over general anesthesia during hospitalization, it has not been definitely concluded that there is a causal link between a particular anesthetic method and the improvement in the postoperative outcome for TKA [
17,
18]. In our results, we found no differences in the incidence of VTE, compared between epidural and general anesthesia for TKA. We postulate that this is mainly due to the technical development of general anesthesia and sufficient postoperative pain control for accelerated rehabilitation.
In our study, general anesthesia was performed with TIVA, and maintained with propofol and remifentanil using TCI. Propofol suppresses stress-related hormones and the inflammatory reaction, and inhibits platelet aggregation under surgical stimuli. The neuroendocrine stress response is caused by surgical stimulation that leads to hypercoagulability, especially during general anesthesia, when the concentration of catecholamine, cortisol, and growth hormones in the blood increase in response to the inhalation anesthetics [
19-
21]. These stress hormones have been shown to elevate platelet responsiveness to collagen, adenosine diphosphate, and ristocetin in humans [
22]. Propofol causes the suppression of platelet aggregation via aforementioned mechanisms. Moreover, remifentanil has a very short duration of action, even when it is administered for a long duration. The anesthesia depth of remifentanil can be quickly controlled to minimize hemodynamic changes with the use of a tourniquet. In our study, all patients in the general group were monitored using the bispectral index for anesthetic depth, and anesthetics were administered via the TCI device. Because remifentanil has detrimental effects on hemodynamics if overdose, TCI device allows adequate infusion depending on pharmacokinetic models. This general anesthesia strategy prevents the synergistic effect of propofol, and allows the maintenance of stable cardiopulmonary function during the perioperative period.
TIVA contributes to early ambulation due to a rapid recovery from anesthesia, and is additionally advantageous in terms of avoiding potential complications, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting, and the fast recovery of cognitive function, which makes patients return to daily activities as soon as possible [
23]. TIVA also has an advantage in terms of its analgesic effect on postoperative pain [
20,
24]. Because of the nature of TKA, which is a surgical treatment for osteoarthritis, elderly patients account for the majority of patients. Therefore, TIVA would be more beneficial than volatile inhalation anesthesia for accelerated rehabilitation of elderly patients who have undergone surgery.
In TKA, the tourniquet has the advantage of securing a surgical field, although, there is concern that it may increase the incidence of DVT after surgery. The location of most DVTs, located using a tourniquet, is calf veins, and the DVT location of our data showed an identical tendency. Distal DVT rarely causes fatal thromboembolic event such as symptomatic PTE, compared to proximal DVT, and mostly resolves spontaneously without any event [
14]. We should also consider the effect of tourniquet time or operation time on DVT between the two groups. In a study by Hernandez et al. [
25], they have not shown any relationship between tourniquet time and incidence of DVT, and the incidence of proximal DVT increased as the operation time was longer than 120 minutes. Although we could not obtain information about tourniquet time, the low DVT incidence in our study is presumed to be attributed to a short operation time that was less than 120 minutes, in both the groups.
We routinely delivered PCA for both groups after TKA. According to the type of anesthesia, the PCA application also differs; intravenous PCA is conducted in the general group and continuous epidural PCA is conducted in the epidural group. PCA enabled the patients of both the groups to achieve early ambulation and perform passive exercise under more comfortable postoperative conditions. Generally, postoperative pain control with epidural PCA is effective for a rapid recovery of exercise in orthopedic surgery, and intravenous opioid analgesics are likely to be adverse due to opioid-related side effects and insufficient pain control for TKA [
26]. However, the use of non-opioid analgesics as adjuvants can reduce the total dose of opioids in intravenous PCA, which improves postoperative analgesia [
23]. Opioids have various side effects such as nausea, vomiting, ileus, pruritus, or confusion, and high doses of opioids would lead to severe side effects such as respiratory depression. Another concern regarding opioids is their intraoperative infusion, which may cause opioid-induced hyperalgesia during the postoperative period. To overcome the aforementioned side effects of opioids in our patients, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) were included in intravenous PCA, and intravenous bolus 50 μg of fentanyl and intravenous PCA was administered simultaneously 10 minutes before emergence to enhance the quality of analgesia during recovery. Thus, there were no patients with complications related to intravenous PCA. Although there is evidence that NSAIDs increases the risk of VTE [
27], we are currently unsure if NSAIDs or other confounding factors increase the risk of VTE.
Brooks et al. [
28] showed a 3.8% of overall incidence of VTE following TKA, with epidural anesthesia. These authors used sonography to diagnose VTE. This incidence is much lower than our results of 7.1% incidence of DVT alone and 8.0% incidence of both DVT and PTE. Kim and Kim [
14] reported an overall 26.6% DVT incidence in Korea. These studies imply that the incidence of VTE shows a wide variation according to the diagnostic modalities used, whether or not chemoprophylaxis was provided and when the diagnostic test was performed.
Among the imaging modalities used to diagnose postoperative DVT, venography and color Doppler ultrasonography have been commonly used for the early detection of DVT. However, these techniques have crucial disadvantages [
29]. Venography is highly useful for DVT detection, although, not for PTE detection, and the procedure itself might cause allergic reactions and DVT occurrence; additionally, it is highly invasive. When using color Doppler ultrasonography, patients need to change positions, such as supine and prone positions. Using this diagnostic tool, it is also difficult to accurately examine the lesions in the inferior vena cava, iliac vein, and the pulmonary vein. Despite a high specificity, the sensitivity of ultrasound for detecting asymptomatic DVT is low (47%-62%) and has low inter-observer reproducibility [
29]. Also, ultrasonography is unable to diagnose PTE [
29,
30] and its sensitivity for detecting DVT after total joint arthroplasty is low.
In our study, we used DVT CT, a highly sensitive diagnostic tool for postoperative VTE diagnosis. DVT CT angiography takes a relatively short time to perform without positional changes, and can examine the lower limb vessels, including the regions of the thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic vessels [
30]. This modality is highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing DVT. In addition, asymptomatic DVT can be detected early, and the difference between VTE incidence depending on the anesthetic method can be observed more clearly.
Despite presenting a lack of significant difference in the incidence of VTE between general and epidural anesthesia, our study has certain limitations. First, we did not perform preoperative VTE screening. Our results might include patients with preoperative VTE, despite having no preoperative symptomatic evidence for DVT or PTE in our review. Second, this study mainly focused on VTE complications; although, other complications during TKA should simultaneously be evaluated, including long-term mortality. VTE is one of a range of possible complications that occur as a result of TKA. An integrated consideration of other complications could provide a more sophisticated approach to the anesthetic management used for TKA. Third, the very low incidence of VTE or PTE might distort the comparative interpretation of our results to those of previous studies. In conclusion, the correlation between the factors could be confirmed in the retrospective study, but we could not infer exact conclusions about causality from the retrospective data. Thus, a planned prospective study with a larger sample size should be enabled through a multicenter study. This type of project will provide more accurate data to evaluate the exact incidence of DVT and prepare guidelines and protocols for medical prophylaxis, none of which exist in the Asian population.
In summary, there was no statistical difference in the incidence of VTE after TKA between patients receiving general anesthesia using TIVA and those receiving epidural anesthesia in our study. Therefore, if we could demonstrate that discreet techniques of general anesthesia, and epidural anesthesia have a similar effect against VTE with early diagnosis using DVT CT, it would help to establish guidelines and protocols for anesthetic and analgesic techniques for VTE prevention following TKA in Korea.