Erratum: Effect of needle approach to the axillary artery on transarterial axillary brachial plexus block quality
Article information
Anesth Pain Med. 2018;13(1):111-111
1
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
2
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Younsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Anesth Pain Med 2017;12:357-362
https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.2017.12.4.357
was printed with incorrect text. In the Figure, “Radial artery” should be corrected to “Axillary artery.”
Perpendicular approach group (PA group) versus the shallow needle approach group (SA group). When the scalp vein needle (23 G, 3/4’) was advanced into the axillary artery, the needle was directed perpendicular to the axillary artery in the PA group (A), whereas in the SA group, a shallow needle approach to the axillary artery was used (B).
The corrected figure is shown below.
Article information Continued
Copyright: © The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
Fig. 1
Perpendicular approach group (PA group) versus the shallow needle approach group (SA group). When the scalp vein needle (23 G, 3/4’) was advanced into the axillary artery, the needle was directed perpendicular to the axillary artery in the PA group (A), whereas in the SA group, a shallow needle approach to the axillary artery was used (B).