Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.

Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.

Erratum: Effect of needle approach to the axillary artery on transarterial axillary brachial plexus block quality

Article information

Anesth Pain Med. 2018;13(1):111-111
Publication date (electronic) : 2018 January 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.2018.13.1.111
Young Jin Chang1, Dong Chul Lee1, Young Jun Oh2, Dong Hun Ha2, Mi Geum Lee1
1 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
2 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Younsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Anesth Pain Med 2017;12:357-362

https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.2017.12.4.357

Figure 1 was printed with incorrect text. In the Figure, “Radial artery” should be corrected to “Axillary artery.”

Fig. 1

Perpendicular approach group (PA group) versus the shallow needle approach group (SA group). When the scalp vein needle (23 G, 3/4’) was advanced into the axillary artery, the needle was directed perpendicular to the axillary artery in the PA group (A), whereas in the SA group, a shallow needle approach to the axillary artery was used (B).

The corrected figure is shown below.

Article information Continued

Copyright: © The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Perpendicular approach group (PA group) versus the shallow needle approach group (SA group). When the scalp vein needle (23 G, 3/4’) was advanced into the axillary artery, the needle was directed perpendicular to the axillary artery in the PA group (A), whereas in the SA group, a shallow needle approach to the axillary artery was used (B).