Anesth Pain Med Search

CLOSE


Anesth Pain Med > Volume 21(3); 2026 > Article
Ge and Xing: Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in geriatric anesthesia: moving toward personalized brain protection strategies

Abstract

The increasing volume of geriatric surgical procedures presents a critical challenge: protecting the aging brain from perioperative complications such as postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Conventional anesthetic management, which relies primarily on systemic parameters like blood pressure, often overlooks age-related vulnerabilities, including impaired cerebral autoregulation and reduced cerebrovascular reserve. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) offers a valuable solution by providing real-time, noninvasive assessment of cerebral hemodynamics. This modality enables dynamic monitoring of key indicators, such as mean flow velocity and pulsatility index, to detect cerebral hypoperfusion, microembolic events, and blood flow variability—all of which represent significant risk factors for neurological injury. A major advantage of TCD lies in its capacity to guide individualized blood pressure management. By determining each patient’s optimal mean arterial pressure, TCD assists clinicians in preventing both hypotension and hypertension, thereby surpassing the limitations of a one-size-fits-all approach. Despite remaining challenges—such as operator dependence and the need for larger-scale validation studies—the future of TCD appears promising. Integration with robotic systems and artificial intelligence is expected to improve automation and reliability. Ultimately, TCD is likely to become an integral component of multimodal intraoperative monitoring, facilitating a data-driven, brain-centered anesthetic strategy that enhances the safety and well-being of elderly surgical patients.

INTRODUCTION: THE GLOBAL CHALLENGE OF POPULATION AGING AND PERIOPERATIVE BRAIN HEALTH

The accelerating global aging population has resulted in a steady increase in surgical procedures among older adults [1]. This population is particularly susceptible to inadequate cerebral perfusion, postoperative delirium (POD), postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) [2], and, in rarer cases, perioperative stroke, owing to impaired cerebral autoregulation (CA), reduced cerebrovascular reserve (CVR), and variable responses to anesthetic agents. These complications not only markedly increase patient morbidity, mortality, and hospital length of stay but also compromise long-term quality of life and functional independence, potentially accelerating the progression of dementia [3].
The pathophysiology of perioperative neurological complications is complex and involves multifactorial interactions among processes such as inflammation, oxidative stress, neurotoxicity, and, importantly, cerebral hemodynamic imbalance. Due to vascular stiffening, endothelial dysfunction, and impaired CA, the aging brain demonstrates diminished tolerance to fluctuations in blood pressure and anesthetic exposure [4]. Conventional anesthetic management, which frequently depends on macroscopic indices such as systemic blood pressure and heart rate, does not provide real-time, precise evaluation of the brain’s actual perfusion status or oxygen supply-demand balance. This lack of targeted information limits the clinician’s ability to prevent perioperative cerebral injury effectively.
Compared with other intraoperative neuromonitoring modalities, transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) offers distinct advantages by enabling real-time assessment of cerebral blood flow (CBF) dynamics and autoregulatory function [5,6]. Unlike near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), bispectral index (BIS) monitoring, or electroencephalography (EEG), which primarily provide information on cortical oxygenation or electrical activity, TCD directly measures cerebral perfusion and vascular reactivity [7], thereby supplying clinically actionable data to support individualized anesthetic management in elderly patients.

METHODS: SEARCH STRATEGY AND SELECTION CRITERIA

A narrative review of the literature was conducted to summarize the role of TCD in geriatric anesthesia. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for articles published between January 2000 and March 2025. To ensure completeness, seminal studies from the 1980s and 1990s describing the early development and validation of TCD were also included. The search strategy combined the following keywords and their variants: “transcranial Doppler,” “TCD,” “cerebral blood flow,” “cerebral autoregulation,” “anesthesia,” “elderly,” “geriatrics,” and “perioperative monitoring.” In addition, reference lists of relevant articles and review papers were screened to identify supplementary studies. Eligible publications included original research articles, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and review papers that examined the use of TCD in anesthesia, perioperative monitoring, cerebral hemodynamics, or neurological outcomes in elderly patients. Articles not written in English, conference abstracts without full text, and studies unrelated to perioperative or geriatric populations were excluded.

TCD: PRINCIPLES, TECHNIQUES, AND RECENT TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES

Doppler effect and key hemodynamic parameters

TCD is a noninvasive technique based on the Doppler effect. The underlying principle is that when an ultrasound wave emitted from the probe encounters moving blood, primarily red blood cells, the frequency of the reflected wave changes. The frequency increases when blood moves toward the probe and decreases when it moves away. TCD devices detect this frequency shift and, together with the angle of insonation, calculate blood flow velocity within the targeted vessel. In clinical settings, TCD provides a series of essential parameters that represent the cerebral hemodynamic state (Table 1) [8].
(1) Peak systolic velocity (PSV): The maximum flow velocity during systole, reflecting cardiac output and vascular compliance.
(2) End-diastolic velocity (EDV): The minimum flow velocity during diastole, primarily influenced by distal vascular resistance.
(3) Mean flow velocity (MFV): The average velocity throughout the cardiac cycle, proportional to cerebral blood flow (CBF) and commonly used to evaluate cerebral perfusion.
(4) Pulsatility index (PI): Calculated as PI = (PSV - EDV) / MFV; serves as an indirect indicator of distal vascular resistance and intracranial pressure (ICP).
(5) Resistive index (RI): Calculated as RI = (PSV - EDV) / PSV; similar to PI, it is used to assess vascular resistance.
These parameters collectively constitute a comprehensive hemodynamic monitoring framework. For instance, a pronounced decrease in MFV accompanied by a substantial increase in PI and RI following anesthetic induction in an elderly patient strongly suggests inadequate cerebral perfusion or elevated intracranial pressure, warranting prompt clinical intervention.

Standardized procedures and clinical significance of different acoustic windows

To obtain stable and reliable TCD signals, clinical procedures should follow standardized protocols [9]. The most commonly used site is the transtemporal window, located above the ear, which permits ultrasound transmission through the thinnest portion of the temporal bone. This window enables the assessment of blood flow in the middle cerebral artery (MCA), anterior cerebral artery, and posterior cerebral artery. Among these, the MCA serves as a primary indicator of global cerebral hemodynamics due to its consistent anatomical position and extensive perfusion territory. Other commonly used acoustic windows include the transoccipital window, which provides access to the vertebrobasilar system, and the transorbital window, which allows visualization of the ophthalmic artery and internal carotid siphon. In specific procedures such as carotid endarterectomy (CEA), blood flow changes detected through these windows are monitored to evaluate the operation’s effect on cerebral perfusion. Despite its advantages, TCD application continues to face certain limitations. Inadequate acoustic windows—often resulting from skull thickening—occur in approximately 10-20% of elderly Asian patients, thereby restricting its widespread use [10]. Furthermore, TCD is highly operator-dependent, necessitating specialized training to achieve optimal probe placement and signal acquisition [11].

TCD technology advancements: robotic TCD and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted analysis

TCD technology is progressing toward greater automation and integration with AI, aiming to reduce operator dependency and enhance clinical applicability. Robotic TCD: Robotic systems can autonomously identify intracranial acoustic windows and maintain stable probe positioning, thereby minimizing technical variability and improving the success rate of signal acquisition. Clinically, this advancement allows consistent and reliable monitoring even in patients with suboptimal acoustic windows [11]. AI-assisted analysis: AI algorithms can automatically detect abnormal TCD patterns—such as high-intensity transient signals (HITS)—and continuously track flow velocity trends in real time. This functionality supports clinicians by providing early alerts regarding potential cerebral perfusion abnormalities and assisting with decision-making during perioperative management [12,13]. These technological innovations indicate that TCD is evolving from a skill-dependent diagnostic modality into a standardized, automated, and clinically versatile instrument, thereby enhancing precision brain monitoring in perioperative settings.

THE UNIQUE CEREBROVASCULAR PHYSIOLOGY OF THE ELDERLY AND THE EFFECTS OF ANESTHETIC AGENTS

CA: physiology and the effects of aging

CA is a vital physiological mechanism that maintains CBF within a stable range despite fluctuations in mean arterial pressure (MAP), typically between 60 and 150 mmHg. This regulation relies on the integrated actions of multiple mechanisms [14], including the myogenic response (smooth muscle contraction in vessel walls), neurogenic control (autonomic nervous system activity), and metabolic regulation (changes in brain metabolites such as carbon dioxide [CO2] and nitric oxide [NO]). However, CA function declines significantly in the elderly due to several interrelated factors [15]:
(1) Vascular structural alterations: Atherosclerosis leads to arterial stiffening and reduced elasticity, thereby weakening vascular responsiveness to blood pressure variations.
(2) Impaired neurovascular coupling: The coordination between neuronal activity and regional CBF diminishes, limiting the brain’s ability to rapidly adjust local blood flow according to metabolic demand.
(3) Endothelial dysfunction: An imbalance between vasodilatory mediators (e.g., NO) and vasoconstrictive substances produced by endothelial cells disrupts normal vascular regulation.
These alterations collectively shift the autoregulatory curve in elderly patients toward a higher blood pressure range and narrow its effective operating bandwidth. Consequently, older adults require a higher MAP to sustain adequate cerebral perfusion and exhibit a reduced tolerance to blood pressure fluctuations. Conventional blood pressure management targets may therefore be insufficient to ensure optimal cerebral perfusion in this population, increasing the risk of cerebral hypoperfusion during the perioperative period [14].

Molecular mechanisms and clinical impact of anesthetics on cerebral hemodynamics

The effects of anesthetic agents on cerebral hemodynamics are multifaceted and vary according to the pharmacological class of the drug. Clinically, TCD enables real-time monitoring of CBF velocity and autoregulatory dynamics [16].
(1) Inhalational anesthetics: Volatile agents such as sevoflurane and isoflurane primarily act by dose-dependently suppressing neuronal activity and reducing cerebral metabolic rate. However, these agents also exert potent vasodilatory effects, particularly on cerebral vessels [17]. In younger patients with intact CA, this vasodilation is typically counterbalanced by autoregulatory mechanisms. In elderly patients with impaired CA, however, this effect can lead to a perfusion-metabolism uncoupling, making CBF more dependent on systemic blood pressure and further compromising autoregulatory function.
(2) Intravenous anesthetics: Intravenous agents such as propofol and etomidate generally decrease CBF by lowering the cerebral metabolic rate. This metabolism-perfusion coupling may be beneficial in elderly patients with impaired CA, as it reduces the brain’s metabolic and perfusion demands [18]. Nevertheless, when accompanied by a marked reduction in systemic blood pressure, these agents may still precipitate cerebral hypoperfusion.
(3) Neuromuscular blockers and opioids: Most neuromuscular blocking agents exert minimal effects on CBF. Opioids (e.g., fentanyl) slightly decrease CBF by reducing cerebral metabolism, although their impact on autoregulatory function remains negligible.
The use of real-time TCD monitoring during anesthetic induction, maintenance, and emergence allows clinicians to continuously evaluate how anesthetic agents influence a patient’s CA function [19]. Early alterations in MFV and PI on TCD can serve as early indicators of cerebral hypoperfusion, enabling timely interventions such as anesthetic titration or vasopressor administration to preserve cerebral perfusion and protect brain function.

TCD-GUIDED MONITORING AND PREDICTION OF PERIOPERATIVE NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS

Perioperative neurological complications, particularly POD and POCD [20,21], are complex and multifactorial in nature. Their underlying mechanisms include cerebral ischemia and hypoxia, inflammatory cascades, neurotoxic effects, and microvascular injury. TCD [22-24], as a real-time and dynamic monitoring modality [25], offers distinct advantages in detecting and predicting these risks. It facilitates a transition from traditional, experience-based anesthetic management to a data-driven approach, enabling truly individualized brain protection. TCD primarily assists in monitoring and predicting postoperative neurological complications through several key indicators, as outlined below.

Identification of cerebral microembolic load and risk assessment

Perioperative microembolism plays a pivotal role in the development of postoperative stroke and cognitive impairment. These microemboli—composed of air, fat, or platelet aggregates—enter the cerebral circulation and occlude small vessels, resulting in localized microinfarctions. Real-time detection of HITS—brief, high-amplitude spikes on the TCD waveform whose frequency and count reflect the microembolic load—enables clinicians to assess embolic risk and implement timely preventive interventions during surgery [26]. Continuous HITS monitoring is particularly valuable during procedures such as CEA, cardiac valve replacement, and major orthopedic operations, including total hip arthroplasty [27]. Evidence indicates that a high intraoperative HITS burden is an independent predictor of POD and POCD [28]. These microemboli may obstruct cerebral microvessels and induce neuroinflammatory responses, ultimately contributing to postoperative cognitive decline. Accordingly, real-time HITS surveillance provides actionable feedback, allowing surgeons to minimize embolic release and assisting anesthesiologists in evaluating the efficacy of thromboprophylactic strategies.

Monitoring and prediction of abnormal cerebral perfusion (hypoperfusion and hyperperfusion)

Beyond microembolic events, both insufficient and excessive CBF can be detrimental [20].As previously described, impaired CA in older adults increases their susceptibility to hypotension. Early reductions in MFV serve as sensitive indicators of cerebral hypoperfusion, allowing clinicians to initiate corrective measures before systemic hypotension develops. Sustained or recurrent cerebral hypoperfusion during surgery represents a major risk factor for POD and POCD [29], as even brief episodes of reduced perfusion may lead to irreversible neuronal injury [30]. Conversely, cerebral hyperperfusion can disrupt the blood-brain barrier and precipitate cerebral edema, particularly following CEA. Postoperative monitoring of MCA flow velocities enables early recognition of abnormally elevated values, indicating a heightened risk of hyperperfusion and guiding precise blood pressure management to prevent postoperative stroke or hyperperfusion syndrome.

Quantification of CBF variability and cognitive risk

In addition to isolated hypo- or hyperperfusion states, emerging evidence suggests that fluctuations in CBF during the perioperative period may themselves constitute an independent risk factor for POCD [20]. TCD enables continuous monitoring of subtle flow variations, including high-frequency oscillations in MFV even within normal MAP ranges. Such variability is increasingly recognized as a marker of impaired or unstable CA, potentially associated with microvascular injury, neuronal dysfunction, and blood-brain barrier compromise [21,31]. By quantifying CBF variability in real time, anesthesiologists can identify patients at increased risk of cognitive decline, optimize hemodynamic and perfusion strategies, and maintain greater stability in CBF. This proactive, data-driven management approach may reduce perioperative neurological complications and support brain-protective anesthesia practices.

Application cases of TCD in different types of surgery

1. Cardiac surgery

In cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) procedures, TCD serves as an essential tool for evaluating CBF [32]. During CPB, monitoring the HITS burden and MFV enables clinicians to assess the adequacy of de-airing maneuvers and to guide individualized perfusion pressure management. A decline in MFV indicates the need to increase CPB perfusion pressure, whereas an elevated HITS count suggests re-examining the circuit for residual air or other embolic sources.

2. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA)

CEA carries a substantial risk of perioperative stroke, and TCD is widely regarded as the gold standard for intraoperative cerebral monitoring [33]. During carotid clamping, assessing collateral flow through the circle of Willis assists in determining whether shunt placement is necessary. Postoperatively, monitoring HITS activity and CBF velocities aids in predicting postoperative stroke and hyperperfusion syndrome.

3. Major orthopedic surgery

During total hip arthroplasty, TCD allows real-time detection of microembolic signals, enabling prompt identification of fat emboli arising from bone cement injection or elevated intramedullary pressure [34]. This information assists both anesthesiologists and orthopedic surgeons in optimizing intraoperative management.
These clinical examples demonstrate that TCD is not merely a basic monitoring tool but a crucial modality that supports evidence-based decision-making and promotes a “brain-centered” perioperative management paradigm.

FROM UNIVERSAL TO PERSONALIZED: TCD IN GERIATRIC ANESTHESIA FOR CUSTOMIZED BLOOD PRESSURE MANAGEMENT

Traditional anesthetic blood pressure management frequently relies on age-adjusted or fixed MAP targets. However, this “one-size-fits-all” approach overlooks substantial interindividual variability in CA, particularly among older adults. In a patient with intact CA, a lower MAP may still lie within the autoregulatory range, whereas the same MAP could result in severe cerebral hypoperfusion in another patient with markedly impaired CA [35]. TCD provides a means to transcend conventional approaches, enabling a CBF-guided, patient-specific blood pressure management strategy.

Dynamic assessment of CA and the determination of the “optimal blood pressure”

The principal advantage of TCD lies in its capacity to dynamically assess a patient’s CA function rather than presuming its normality. Assessment typically depends on evaluating the relationship between MFV and MAP [36]. Under ideal conditions, when MAP fluctuates within the autoregulatory range, MFV remains relatively stable, and the correlation between the two parameters is weak. However, once MAP falls outside the autoregulatory limits, MFV becomes positively correlated with MAP—meaning that a decrease in blood pressure leads to a proportional decline in CBF [31]. Building upon this principle, researchers have developed several methodologies to quantify CA function and determine an individual’s optimal MAP [37]:
(1) Cerebral autoregulation index (ARI): ARI is among the most widely utilized quantitative indices for assessing dynamic CA (dCA). It is a dCA monitoring method based on a second-order differential model [38]. ARI values range from 0 to 9, where 0 represents a complete loss of dCA (CBF passively follows MAP changes), and 9 indicates nearly intact dCA (CBF rapidly returns to baseline following a step change in MAP). ARI thus provides an intuitive and clinically applicable approach for monitoring dCA, remaining one of the most established tools in both research and perioperative practice.
(2) Correlation analysis: The mean flow index (Mx) is a time-domain metric used to assess dCA [39]. It quantifies the correlation between spontaneous fluctuations in arterial blood pressure (ABP)—or cerebral perfusion pressure—and CBF velocity in the MCA (MCAv), as measured by TCD. A higher Mx value denotes a stronger positive correlation, reflecting impaired autoregulatory function, whereas a lower or negative Mx value indicates preserved autoregulation. Typically, continuous recordings of ABP and MCAv are averaged over sequential time intervals, or “blocks,” each lasting approximately 10 s; however, some studies have adopted shorter durations, such as 5 s [39]. Roughly 30 consecutive blocks constitute an “epoch,” during which the Pearson correlation coefficient between MAP and MCAv is calculated, producing a single Mx value that can be updated continuously. This analytical approach enables near real-time evaluation of dCA and is widely applied in both research and clinical contexts to optimize cerebral perfusion management.

TCD-guided selection and dosing of vasopressors

After determining the optimal MAP, TCD also serves as a real-time feedback tool for guiding clinical interventions. When a patient’s MAP falls below the identified optimal level and TCD demonstrates a corresponding reduction in MFV, it signals the need for vasopressor administration.
(1) Drug selection: TCD assists in evaluating the differential effects of various vasopressors on CBF [40]. For instance, phenylephrine primarily increases blood pressure through peripheral vasoconstriction with minimal direct influence on cerebral vessels, whereas ephedrine may enhance CBF indirectly by augmenting cardiac output. By continuously tracking MFV changes, clinicians can determine which vasopressor more effectively improves cerebral perfusion in a given patient.
(2) Dose adjustment: During vasopressor titration, TCD provides real-time feedback on MFV dynamics, enabling anesthesiologists to identify the optimal dosing range. Stabilization of MFV values accompanied by an increase in the ARI indicates that the current hemodynamic management strategy is effective, thereby avoiding unnecessary vasopressor escalation. This precision-guided approach minimizes cardiac workload and lowers the risk of hypertensive or hemorrhagic complications.
In summary, TCD transforms blood pressure management in elderly patients from an empirical, experience-based practice into a precise, data-driven, and individualized process. This approach not only prevents cerebral hypoperfusion but also mitigates the risks associated with overtreatment, forming a critical foundation for precision anesthesia and personalized brain protection.

TCD FOR PREOPERATIVE RISK EVALUATION

In addition to its intraoperative applications, TCD can serve as a noninvasive and practical tool for preoperative risk assessment. Evaluation of CVR capacity can be performed using the CO2 reactivity test. CVR refers to the ability of cerebral vessels to constrict or dilate in response to stimuli such as changes in cerebral perfusion pressure or arterial partial pressure of CO2 (PaCO2) [41]. The specific ability of cerebral vessels to respond to variations in arterial CO2 levels is termed cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity (CVR-CO2). Assessment of CVR-CO2 provides valuable information about cerebrovascular regulation and collateral circulation, which is crucial for the early diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of several neurological conditions, including stroke and cognitive impairment. Clinically, various imaging modalities are used in combination with physiological tests such as the breath-holding test, CO2 inhalation, or acetazolamide challenge to quantify CVR-CO2. In 1982, Norwegian researcher Aaslid et al. [7] first applied TCD in clinical practice. Its noninvasive, cost-effective, reliable, and user-friendly characteristics have since facilitated its widespread use in screening for cerebrovascular disorders. CVR-CO2 is known to be altered under certain pathophysiological conditions. Multiple studies have demonstrated that patients with Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia exhibit significantly lower CVR-CO2 compared with healthy controls. Following approximately five weeks of treatment with anti-dementia medications, CVR-CO2 values showed marked improvement [42,43]. Similarly, Lee et al. [44] reported that in patients with reduced cerebral perfusion pressure, cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 and vasodilators was diminished, preventing CBF from reaching normal levels. These studies collectively demonstrate that CVR-CO2 can assist clinicians in comprehensively evaluating cerebrovascular regulatory capacity and determining the degree of risk associated with reduced cerebral perfusion pressure in individual patients. Integrating TCD monitoring data with conventional risk factors—such as patient age, comorbidities, and surgical type—shows great potential for the development of a more comprehensive preoperative neurological risk prediction model. Such an integrative approach may enable the early identification and management of high-risk patients through anesthetic optimization, enhanced intraoperative monitoring, and the implementation of targeted neuroprotective strategies.

INTEGRATION OF MULTIMODAL MONITORING: BUILDING A “SMART BRAIN” FOR PRECISION ANESTHESIA

A single brain function monitoring modality typically provides only partial information. For instance, while TCD excels at assessing cerebral hemodynamics, it offers limited insight into cerebral metabolism and electrical activity. EEG and the BIS reflect anesthetic depth but provide no direct information about cerebral perfusion. NIRS monitors cerebral tissue oxygenation; however, its signals can be influenced by extracerebral factors. Therefore, integrating these technologies into a multimodal monitoring platform represents a critical step toward achieving a comprehensive assessment of perioperative brain function (Fig. 1) [45,46].

Complementarity of TCD and EEG/BIS

1. Independent information

TCD provides detailed data on cerebral hemodynamics (the supply), whereas EEG and BIS offer insights into neural electrical activity (the demand). Under physiological conditions, cerebral metabolism (demand) and CBF (supply) are closely coupled. However, in elderly patients and under anesthesia, this coupling may become disrupted.

2. Synergistic diagnosis

Discrepancies between TCD and EEG/BIS findings can indicate potential risks. For example, if the BIS value remains within the normal range (suggesting adequate anesthetic depth) but TCD reveals a sustained decrease in MFV, this may signal occult cerebral hypoperfusion. In such cases, the brain might transiently maintain stable electrical activity due to a reduced metabolic rate; however, prolonged hypoperfusion can ultimately result in neuronal injury. The early warning provided by TCD enables anesthesiologists to promptly adjust blood pressure to prevent inadequate cerebral perfusion. It is important to note that BIS, NIRS, and TCD monitor distinct cerebral regions. BIS reflects global cortical electrical activity, NIRS predominantly measures regional cortical oxygenation in the frontal lobe, and TCD typically targets blood flow velocity in the MCA. Owing to these spatial differences, discrepancies between modalities may occur, underscoring the need for careful interpretation when integrating multimodal data.

Synergistic effects of TCD and NIRS

NIRS indirectly evaluates the balance between cerebral oxygen supply and demand by measuring hemoglobin oxygenation levels, thereby providing regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) data [47]. Combining NIRS with TCD enables a more comprehensive assessment of cerebral oxygen supply-demand dynamics [48,49].
(1) Identifying supply-demand mismatch: When a reduction in MFV detected by TCD coincides with a concurrent decline in rSO2 measured by NIRS, this strongly suggests severe cerebral hypoperfusion requiring immediate intervention, such as vasopressor administration or blood transfusion.
(2) Differential diagnosis: If TCD reveals a decrease in MFV while NIRS-derived rSO2 remains stable, this pattern may indicate compensatory cerebral adaptation through an increased oxygen extraction ratio. Although the immediate risk is lower, vigilant monitoring remains necessary. Conversely, if MFV measured by TCD increases but rSO2 on NIRS fails to rise proportionally, it may indicate microvascular dysfunction or impaired oxygen diffusion.
This integrated multimodal approach allows clinicians to distinguish whether inadequate cerebral perfusion results primarily from decreased blood flow, reduced oxygen-carrying capacity (e.g., anemia), or microcirculatory impairment, thereby guiding targeted interventions. Compared with other perioperative brain monitoring techniques, each modality provides distinct yet complementary data: BIS and EEG primarily reflect cortical electrical activity, NIRS measures regional oxygenation, and TCD uniquely quantifies dynamic CBF while detecting microembolic signals via HITS monitoring. Integrating TCD with multimodal platforms that include NIRS and BIS enhances clinical decision-making by combining hemodynamic, metabolic, and electrophysiological perspectives. This comprehensive strategy advances precision in cerebral monitoring and supports personalized brain-protection protocols in geriatric anesthesia.

Integration of TCD with other emerging monitoring technologies

In the future, the integration of TCD is expected to extend beyond traditional neuromonitoring modalities. For example, it can be incorporated into research on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum biomarkers. Perioperative brain injury is often associated with elevated levels of neuronal injury biomarkers [50], such as neuron-specific enolase and S100B protein, in the serum or CSF. Correlating intraoperative TCD-derived parameters—including microembolic load and hypoperfusion duration—with postoperative biomarker concentrations may help validate the predictive utility of TCD for perioperative brain injury, thereby establishing the foundation for more comprehensive risk assessment models. Ultimately, integrating these technologies into a multimodal monitoring platform enhanced by AI-assisted analysis is likely to define the next phase of precision anesthesia. Such a platform would display real-time data from TCD, NIRS, and EEG, automatically calculate indices such as the ARI, detect abnormal hemodynamic or metabolic patterns, and generate alerts. The anesthesiologist could then interpret these alerts and synthesize multimodal data to perform a comprehensive evaluation—for instance, determining whether a complication arises from impaired blood flow (TCD decrease) or oxygenation deficit (NIRS decrease). This integrative, AI-assisted approach has the potential to transform anesthetic management from a reactive to a proactive model, ensuring optimal cerebral protection in elderly surgical patients.

CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Although TCD demonstrates significant potential in geriatric anesthesia, its widespread adoption in clinical practice continues to face multiple challenges. Much of the current evidence is derived from small-scale observational or retrospective studies, which are insufficient to establish TCD as a standard monitoring modality. Large, multicenter randomized controlled trials are urgently required to validate its clinical utility. Furthermore, TCD performance depends heavily on both acoustic window quality and operator proficiency, which limits its applicability in certain patient populations and necessitates specialized training for consistent and reliable use.

Robotics and AI-assisted TCD

Recent advances in robotic probe positioning and AI-based waveform analysis show considerable promise in reducing operator dependence and enhancing monitoring stability. These technologies can automatically identify optimal acoustic windows, maintain probe alignment, and generate real-time alerts for abnormal cerebral flow patterns. However, their clinical feasibility and safety remain under investigation. Current research primarily consists of feasibility or proof-of-concept studies, with large-scale validation across diverse perioperative populations still lacking. Additionally, issues related to probe fixation safety, algorithm transparency, and integration into existing perioperative monitoring workflows must be addressed before routine clinical implementation.

Portable and wearable devices

The development of compact, portable, or wearable TCD systems may enable continuous, long-term hemodynamic monitoring in post-anesthesia care units, intensive care units, or even in outpatient and home-care settings. Such advancements would extend the role of TCD beyond the operating room, expanding opportunities for continuous perioperative and post-discharge brain protection in elderly patients.

Future research directions

To fully realize the potential of TCD, future research should prioritize the following directions:
(1) Conducting large, multicenter randomized controlled trials to validate the relationship between TCD-derived parameters and perioperative neurological outcomes.
(2) Assessing robotic and AI-assisted TCD systems across diverse patient populations, with emphasis on safety, reproducibility, and seamless integration into perioperative workflows.
(3) Developing standardized multimodal monitoring protocols that combine TCD with EEG, BIS, NIRS, and biomarker analysis to achieve personalized brain-protection strategies.
(4) Investigating long-term cognitive outcomes in relation to perioperative cerebral perfusion variability and cumulative microembolic load.
In summary, TCD is poised to serve as an indispensable “eye” in geriatric anesthesia, providing critical support for achieving precision anesthesia and individualized brain protection.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative brain protection in elderly patients remains a major challenge in contemporary anesthesiology. TCD offers a non-invasive and real-time method for assessing cerebrovascular physiology, enabling individualized blood pressure management, and facilitating early prediction of POCD. Looking forward, the integration of TCD with multimodal monitoring systems and AI has the potential to further advance precision anesthesia. Future large-scale studies are required to validate TCD’s clinical efficacy and explore its broader applications across diverse perioperative populations.

Notes

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Writing - original draft: Lan Ge, Taotao Xing. Writing - review & editing: Taotao Xing.

Fig. 1.
Anesthesiologist's intraoperative brain protection decision tree. NIRS: near-infrared spectroscopy, rSO2: regional cerebral oxygen saturation, TCD: transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, MFV: mean flow velocity, ARI: cerebral autoregulation index, HITS: high-intensity transient signals, BIS: bispectral index, EEG: electroencephalography, MAP: mean arterial pressure, BP: blood pressure, FiO2: fraction of inspired oxygen.
apm-25383f1.jpg
Table 1.
TCD Parameters and Their Clinical Applications
Parameter Definition Clinical significance Typical clinical application
PSV Maximum CBF velocity during systole Reflects cardiac output and arterial elasticity A sudden decrease may indicate cerebral hypoperfusion; used to monitor cerebral perfusion during anesthesia and surgery
EDV Minimum CBF velocity during diastole Primarily influenced by distal vascular resistance A low EDV suggests increased distal resistance or impaired autoregulation; assists in identifying risk of cerebral hypoperfusion
MFV Average CBF velocity throughout the cardiac cycle Proportional to CBF A reduction indicates cerebral hypoperfusion; valuable for intraoperative and intensive care monitoring
PI (PSV − EDV) / MFV Indirect marker of distal vascular resistance and ICP An elevated PI may indicate increased ICP or vascular resistance; used to assess cerebrovascular stability and autoregulatory status
RI (PSV − EDV) / PSV Similar to PI, reflects distal vascular resistance An increased RI suggests elevated vascular resistance; useful for detecting vasospasm or cerebral perfusion abnormalities

TCD: transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, PSV: peak systolic velocity, EDV: end-diastolic velocity, MFV: mean flow velocity, PI: pulsatility index, RI: resistive index, CBF: cerebral blood flow, ICP: intracranial pressure.

REFERENCES

1. Zhao Q, Wan H, Pan H, Xu Y. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction-current research progress. Front Behav Neurosci 2024; 18: 1328790.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Lee KF, Wood MD, Maslove DM, Muscedere JG, Boyd JG. Dysfunctional cerebral autoregulation is associated with delirium in critically ill adults. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2019; 39: 2512-20.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
3. Geng J, Zhang Y, Chen H, Shi H, Wu Z, Chen J, et al. Associations between Alzheimer's disease biomarkers and postoperative delirium or cognitive dysfunction: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of prospective clinical trials. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2024; 41: 234-44.
pmid
4. Nyúl-Tóth Á, Patai R, Csiszar A, Ungvari A, Gulej R, Mukli P, et al. Linking peripheral atherosclerosis to blood-brain barrier disruption: elucidating its role as a manifestation of cerebral small vessel disease in vascular cognitive impairment. Geroscience 2024; 46: 6511-36.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
5. Fodale V, Schifilliti D, Conti A, Lucanto T, Pino G, Santamaria LB. Transcranial Doppler and anesthetics. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51: 839-47.
crossref pmid
6. Banik S, Rath GP, Lamsal R, Bithal PK. Effect of dexmedetomidine on dynamic cerebral autoregulation and carbon dioxide reactivity during sevoflurane anesthesia in healthy patients. Korean J Anesthesiol 2020; 73: 311-8.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
7. Aaslid R, Markwalder TM, Nornes H. Noninvasive transcranial Doppler ultrasound recording of flow velocity in basal cerebral arteries. J Neurosurg 1982; 57: 769-74.
crossref pmid
8. Ren J, Li J, Chen S, Liu Y, Ta D. Unveiling the potential of ultrasound in brain imaging: innovations, challenges, and prospects. Ultrasonics 2025; 145: 107465.
crossref pmid
9. Bertuetti R, Gritti P, Pelosi P, Robba C. How to use cerebral ultrasound in the ICU. Minerva Anestesiol 2020; 86: 327-40.
crossref pmid
10. Bazan R, Braga GP, Luvizutto GJ, Hueb JC, Hokama NK, Zanati Bazan SG, et al. Evaluation of the temporal acoustic window for transcranial Doppler in a multi-ethnic population in Brazil. Ultrasound Med Biol 2015; 41: 2131-4.
crossref pmid
11. Mainali S, Cardim D, Sarwal A, Merck LH, Yeatts SD, Czosnyka M, et al. Prolonged automated robotic TCD monitoring in acute severe TBI: study design and rationale. Neurocrit Care 2022; 37(Suppl 2): 267-75.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
12. Gan L, Yin X, Huang J, Jia B. Transcranial Doppler analysis based on computer and artificial intelligence for acute cerebrovascular disease. Math Biosci Eng 2023; 20: 1695-715.
crossref pmid
13. Jazayeri SB, Sabayan B, Pirahanchi Y, Ravi V, Carrión-Penagos J, Bowers J, et al. Risk prediction of cerebrovascular ischemic events following cervical artery dissections using high-intensity transient signals: a systematic review, meta-analysis and a single center experience. Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol 2025; 5: e001704.
crossref pmid pmc
14. Sorond F, Schnyer D, Serrador J, Milberg W, Lipsitz L. Cerebral blood flow regulation during cognitive tasks: effects of healthy aging. Cortex 2008; 44: 179-84.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Claassen JAHR, Thijssen DHJ, Panerai RB, Faraci FM. Regulation of cerebral blood flow in humans: physiology and clinical implications of autoregulation. Physiol Rev 2021; 101: 1487-559.
crossref pmid pmc
16. Luo R, Qiu M, Wu W. Effects of volatile and intravenous anesthetics on postoperative cognitive dysfunction: a mechanistic review. J Anesth 2025; 39: 793-804.
crossref pmid pdf
17. Kuroda Y, Murakami M, Tsuruta J, Murakawa T, Sakabe T. Blood flow velocity of middle cerebral artery during prolonged anesthesia with halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane in humans. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 527-32.
crossref pmid pdf
18. Drummond JC. The lower limit of autoregulation: time to revise our thinking? Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 1431-3.
crossref pmid pdf
19. Semrau JS, Motamed M, Ross-White A, Boyd JG. Cerebral oximetry and preventing neurological complication post-cardiac surgery: a systematic review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 59: 1144-54.
crossref pmid pdf
20. Thudium M, Braun L, Stroemer A, Mayr A, Menzenbach J, Saller T, et al. Cerebral overperfusion despite reduced cortical metabolism is associated with postoperative delirium in cardiac surgery patients: a prospective observational study. J Clin Med 2024; 13: 6605.
crossref pmid pmc
21. Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Menon DK, Pickard JD. Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation in head-injured patients. Stroke 1996; 27: 1829-34.
crossref pmid
22. Bah CS, Mbambara B, Xie X, Li J, Iddi AK, Chen C, et al. Practical prognostic tools to predict the risk of postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing cardiac surgery: visual and dynamic nomograms. J Clin Monit Comput 2025; 39: 11-24.
crossref pmid pdf
23. Deiner S, Silverstein JH. Postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103 Suppl 1: i41-6.
crossref pmid pmc
24. Stocchetti N, Carbonara M, Citerio G, Ercole A, Skrifvars MB, Smielewski P, et al. Severe traumatic brain injury: targeted management in the intensive care unit. Lancet Neurol 2017; 16: 452-64.
crossref pmid
25. Cashmore RMJ, Czosnyka M. Transcranial ultrasound in the critically ill patient: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med Exp 2025; 13: 86.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
26. Martin KK, Wigginton JB, Babikian VL, Pochay VE, Crittenden MD, Rudolph JL. Intraoperative cerebral high-intensity transient signals and postoperative cognitive function: a systematic review. Am J Surg 2009; 197: 55-63.
crossref pmid pmc
27. Aburahma AF, Mousa AY, Stone PA. Shunting during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54: 1502-10.
crossref pmid
28. Xiao Z, Ren X, Zhao Q, Wu W, Liang X, Tang J, et al. Relation of middle cerebral artery flow velocity and risk of cognitive decline: a prospective community-based study. J Clin Neurosci 2022; 97: 56-61.
crossref pmid
29. Thudium M, Ellerkmann RK, Heinze I, Hilbert T. Relative cerebral hyperperfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with risk for postoperative delirium: a cross-sectional cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol 2019; 19: 35.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
30. Acharya NK, Goldwaser EL, Forsberg MM, Godsey GA, Johnson CA, Sarkar A, et al. Sevoflurane and Isoflurane induce structural changes in brain vascular endothelial cells and increase blood-brain barrier permeability: possible link to postoperative delirium and cognitive decline. Brain Res 2015; 1620: 29-41.
crossref pmid
31. Battistella V, Camara VD, Nogueira CB, Porto FHG, Jamaci L, Guillermo CV, et al. Transcranial Doppler could help to differentiate the types of dementia? A pilot study when CSF biomarkers are not available. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2020; 127: 899-904.
crossref pmid pdf
32. Kasputytė G, Bukauskienė R, Širvinskas E, Razlevičė I, Bukauskas T, Lenkutis T. The effect of relative cerebral hyperperfusion during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass to delayed neurocognitive recovery. Perfusion 2023; 38: 1688-96.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
33. Wan Y, Teng X, Li S, Yang Y. Application of transcranial Doppler in cerebrovascular diseases. Front Aging Neurosci 2022; 14: 1035086.
crossref pmid pmc
34. Spence JD. Uses of ultrasound in stroke prevention. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2020; 10: 955-64.
crossref pmid pmc
35. Herpich F, Rincon F. Management of acute ischemic stroke. Crit Care Med 2020; 48: 1654-63.
crossref pmid pmc
36. Weijs RWJ, de Roos BM, Thijssen DHJ, Claassen JAHR. Intensive antihypertensive treatment does not lower cerebral blood flow or cause orthostatic hypotension in frail older adults. Geroscience 2024; 46: 4635-46.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
37. Ayasse T, Gaugain S, de Roquetaillade C, Hermans-Didier A, Kindermans M, Chousterman BG, Barthélémy R. Association between cerebral oxygenation and usual parameters of cerebral perfusion in critically ill patients with acute brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2025; 45: 1059-68.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
38. Dóczi TP. Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation measurements. Stroke 1995; 26: 2372-3.
pmid
39. Olsen MH, Riberholt CG, Mehlsen J, Berg RM, Møller K. Reliability and validity of the mean flow index (Mx) for assessing cerebral autoregulation in humans: a systematic review of the methodology. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2022; 42: 27-38.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
40. Ma H, Ahrens E, Wachtendorf LJ, Suleiman A, Shay D, Munoz-Acuna R, et al. Intraoperative use of phenylephrine versus ephedrine and postoperative delirium: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Anesthesiology 2024; 140: 657-67.
crossref pmid pdf
41. Boles Ponto LL, Magnotta VA, Moser DJ, Duff KM, Schultz SK. Global cerebral blood flow in relation to cognitive performance and reserve in subjects with mild memory deficits. Mol Imaging Biol 2006; 8: 363-72.
crossref pmid pdf
42. Glodzik L, Randall C, Rusinek H, de Leon MJ. Cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2013; 35: 427-40.
crossref pmid pmc
43. Bär KJ, Boettger MK, Seidler N, Mentzel HJ, Terborg C, Sauer H. Influence of galantamine on vasomotor reactivity in Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia due to cerebral microangiopathy. Stroke 2007; 38: 3186-92.
crossref pmid
44. Lee JH, Kelly DF, Oertel M, McArthur DL, Glenn TC, Vespa P, et al. Carbon dioxide reactivity, pressure autoregulation, and metabolic suppression reactivity after head injury: a transcranial Doppler study. J Neurosurg 2001; 95: 222-32.
crossref pmid
45. Ghumman BPS, Kumar A, Kumar S. Inadequacy of near-infrared spectroscopy cerebral oximetry monitoring for detecting neurological complication. Ann Card Anaesth 2019; 22: 321-4.
crossref pmid pmc
46. Johansen JW. Update on bispectral index monitoring. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2006; 20: 81-99.
crossref pmid
47. Ali J, Cody J, Maldonado Y, Ramakrishna H. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) for cerebral and tissue oximetry: analysis of evolving applications. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2022; 36(8 Pt A): 2758-66.
crossref pmid
48. Sandroni C, Skrifvars MB, Taccone FS. Brain monitoring after cardiac arrest. Curr Opin Crit Care 2023; 29: 68-74.
crossref pmid pmc
49. Kussman BD, Imaduddin SM, Gharedaghi MH, Heldt T, LaRovere K. Cerebral emboli monitoring using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in adults and children: a review of the current technology and clinical applications in the perioperative and intensive care setting. Anesth Analg 2021; 133: 379-92.
crossref pmid
50. Amoo M, Henry J, O'Halloran PJ, Brennan P, Husien MB, Campbell M, et al. S100B, GFAP, UCH-L1 and NSE as predictors of abnormalities on CT imaging following mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Neurosurg Rev 2022; 45: 1171-93.
crossref pmid pdf
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •   Scopus 
  • 1,845 View
  • 65 Download
Related articles in Anesth Pain Med


ABOUT
ARTICLE & TOPICS
Article category

Browse all articles >

Topics

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
101-3503, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
Tel: +82-2-792-5128    Fax: +82-2-792-4089    E-mail: apm@anesthesia.or.kr                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Society of Anesthesiologists.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next